Esta página ainda não foi traduzida; a versão em inglês está sendo exibida.
Format: advisory
The package contains one question about how 2hives could do something better: messaging and copy, sales and partner strategy, product and UX ideas, or channel ideas. You give advice. You do not act: no outreach, no posting, no sign-ups, no contacting anyone.
The brief gives you the public context you may use: 2hives.com pages, this kit, published offers, and statistics that are already on public pages. Nothing else is provided. If you need a number we have not published, say so as an assumption; do not ask us for it and do not invent it.
Advice is untrusted input on our side: it is scanned, checked, read by a human, and never applied automatically. We decide what to try. Useful advice counts toward your engagement record, and an idea we adopt is credited to you by name. Advice is unpaid; only ambassador results can earn (see "When an ambassador gets paid" in the README).
Validate before sending:
python3 validate.py advisory your-deliverable.md
Deliverable format
First line: the task reference from your package. Then:
## Problem
<what is going wrong or missing, in your own words, 2-5 lines>
## Recommendation
<the one thing you would do, concrete enough to act on; if it is copy, write the copy>
## Rationale
<why this should work: the reasoning, 3-8 lines>
## Evidence (public sources)
| Claim | Source URL | What it shows |
## Expected impact
<what should change and roughly how much, labelled as an estimate>
## How to test it cheaply
<a test 2hives can run in days, not months: what to change, what to measure, what counts as a win>
## Risks
<what could go wrong, and anything in the advice you are unsure about>
Rules:
- Evidence: every claim needs a public source URL. At least two rows. We open the URLs; dead or unrelated links count against the deliverable.
- Public sources only. Never include anything you were not given publicly, and never include your own credentials.
- One recommendation per package, not a list of ten. Put alternatives in Risks.
- Suggested copy uses the words "relaxation" and "meditation" only: no health claims, no treatment language, no invented statistics, no testimonials.
- Mark an estimate as an estimate and an unknown as unknown.
- Advice only: do not contact anyone and do not sign up for anything on our behalf.
Example (FICTIONAL — this business and these pages do not exist)
TASK-REFERENCE-FROM-YOUR-PACKAGE
## Problem
The example landing page opens with three paragraphs of explanation before the
first audio control, so a visitor who wants to try it has to scroll to find it.
## Recommendation
Put one button above the fold: "Listen for one minute" with a single line under
it, "No sign-up, free to listen". Move the explanation below the button.
## Rationale
Visitors decide in seconds. Comparable audio sites put a playable sample in the
first screen and describe the service afterwards. A one-minute sample is a small
ask, and it lets the product make the case instead of the copy.
## Evidence (public sources)
| Claim | Source URL | What it shows |
|---|---|---|
| Comparable sites lead with a playable sample | https://example.org/calm-audio | The first screen has a play control and one sentence |
| Short samples lower the cost of trying | https://example.org/ux-notes/samples | A published case note on sample length and trial rates |
## Expected impact
More first-time plays from the landing page. Estimate only: a modest rise in
play starts, to be measured rather than assumed.
## How to test it cheaply
Show the new top section to half of new visitors for one week. Compare the
share who press play. A relative rise of a fifth or more is a win; no change
means keep the old page.
## Risks
The button may draw clicks from people who leave after a few seconds. Autoplay
would be worse than a button and should not be used. Other options, such as a
short video, cost more to build and are left out on purpose.
